Friday, April 21, 2006
WHITE HISTORY-LIES ABOUT WHITE HISTORY,SLAVERY,WW2,COLONIALISM.
Facts About Slavery
http://viceland.com/issu%20es/v12n5/htdocs/hey.php
We know now that some slaveholders held multiple slaves, we also know now that of the 261,988 free blacks over 28% held slaves, that would be over 68,000 slaveholders.
We also know now that the jews were large slaveholders, 75% of jews owning black slaves. That would mean they had over 150,000 slaveholders (based on a jewish population estimated at 200,000 in 1860).
This means that between the blacks and jews they accounted for 218,000 slaveholders out of a total of 385,000 slave owners.
In fact this means that fewer than 150,000 whites out of a population of 27,000,000 owned slaves, or around 0.5% compared with 75% of jews and 28% of blacks.
Shocked?
Not only were whites not the greatest slave holders per capita, in fact we were not even the majority of slaveholders, these were non-whites.
So remind me again why we're meant to feel guilty?
slavery would not have existed in the Americas without the jews.
2. Who was it who captured the slaves?
======================================
Read What General Lee's Negro Slave Has To Say About Him
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"I was raised by one of the greatest men in the world. There was never one born of a woman greater than Gen. Robert E. Lee, according to my judgment. All of his servants were set free ten years before the war, but all remained on the plantation until after the surrender."
"My master, at his death, left me $360 to educate myself with."
The fact that the war had set him free was of small moment to him, and he stayed with his old master until his death.
"Having stayed on Marse Robert's plantation 18 years after the war and with limited schooling, I am not ashamed to give my history to the world that it might cause some of the young negroes who have school advantages from childhood and early youth, to consider life more seriously and if men of my type had lived in their time, how far they would exceed them along lines of religious, educational and business activities."
[These are words written by William Mack Lee in his autobiography which he wrote to help raise funds for his church. Despite the false claims that many negro slaves suffered at the hands of their White masters, we have here a firsthand account from a freed negro slave that points to the contrary.] SOURCE: Autobiography of Rev. William Mack Lee
For those of you who question whether any source provided by WN is credible, I remind you that the above link points to an University Of North Carolina (UNC) website.
http://docsouth.unc.edu/leewilliam/lee.html
======================
It is a fact that while there were some instances of slave abuse, most slaves regarded their masters similarly. I believe that this is a historical point of fact that will reveal itself eventually as the accepted alternative is simply too fictitious to stand indefinitely.
It is also a fact that black slaveowners in many instances were much harder on their slaves than white slaveowners; a subtlety in history that may come to public light if society will ever recognize that black people in fact were slaveowners.
I would encourage everyone to get a copy of "The South Was Right!) if they have not done so already. It demonstrates the point here among other things and is a very easy read. Here's some examples of slave sentiment from the Works Projects Administration's journals interviewing ex-slaves during the late 30's -a project hidden under the rug after it was discovered that the majority of slaves felt this way:
Simon Phillips, AL
"People has the wrong idea of slave days. We was treated good. My Massa never laid a hand on me the whole time I was wid him...Sometime we loaned the massa money when he was hard pushed."
Mary Rice, AL
"I was happy all de time in slavery days, but dere ain't much to git happy over now...."
Sarah and Tom Douglas, AL
"Slavery times wuz sho good times. We wuz fed an' clothed an' had nothin to worry about..."
And as for the war....
Gus Brown, Richmond VA
"The Yankees didn't beat us, we wuz starved out!....I am a Confederate Veteran."
James Gill, Marvell, AR
"...all dem good times ceasted atter a while when de War come and de Yankees started all dere debbilment [devilment]. Us was Confederates all de while....But de Yankees, dey didn't know dat we was Confederates....When de Yankees ud come dey would ax [ask] my mammy, 'Aunt Mary, is you seen any Se-sesch [secessionists] today?' and mammy, sheud say, 'Now-suh' eben iffen she had seen some of us mens, but when any our sojers ud come and say 'Aunt Mary, is you seen any Yankees 'round here recent?' she ud allus [always] tell dem de truf."
It's hard to get more authoritative than this -interviews conducted by representatives of the vanquishing government. Of course the reason this hasn't come to public light in any real way is because the responses weren't exactly what they had in mind when they began their little project.
---------------------------
Simon Philips, AL
People has the wrong idea of slave days. We was treated good. My Massa never laid a hand on me the whole time I was wid him....Sometime we loaned the massa money when he was hard pushed."
Elijah Henry Hopkins, Little Rock, AR
"I was fed just like I was one of the [master's] children. They even done put me to bed with them. You see, this discrimination on color wasn't as bad then as it is now. They handled you as a slave but they didn't discriminate against you on account of color like they do now. In slavery times, a poor white man was worse off than a nigger."
Sarah and Tom Douglas, AL
"Slavery times wuz sho good times. We wuz fed an' clothed an' had nothin to worry about..."
Jane Georgiana, AL
"Ole Marster dead an' gone an' Ole Mistis too, but I 'members 'em jus' lak dey was, when dey looked atter us whenst we belonged to 'em or dey belong to us, I dunno which it was...De times was better fo' de war....I goes to church an' sings an' prays, an' when de good Lord teks me, I'se ready to go, en I specs to see Jesus an' Ole Mistis an' Ole Martser when I gits to de he'benly land!"
Gus Brown, Richmond VA
"I cannot forget old massa. He was good and kind. He never believed in slavery, but his money was tied up in slaves and he didn't want to lose all he had. I knows I will see him in heaven and even though I have to walk ten miles for a bite of bread, I can still be happy to think about the good times we had then."
one last one...
Cora Gillam, Little Rock, AR
"I'll tell you lady, if the rough element from the North had stayed out of the South the trouble of reconstruction would not have happened....they tried to excite the colored against their white friends. The white folks was still kind to them what had been their slaves. They would have helped them get started. I know that. I always say that if the South could of been left to adjust itself both white and colored would have been better off."
I have many more of these if I haven't yet shattered your fallacious vision of Southern history as "Roots".
Maybe next February, Stormfront should encourage the enlightenment of Black Americans by providing real instances of black history.
======================
ANOTHER MYTH BUSTER..
COLONIALISM WAS THE REASON FOR AFRICANS TROUBLES.
Martin Meredith in his book The Fate of Africa: From the Hopes of Freedom to the Heart of Despair.
Africans are clearly to blame for their own problems.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1586482467/102-7083961-2564956?v=glance
======================================
How to deal with the Native American argument?
Whites were actually there first! Those who go back hundereds of years can also go back thousands
Check these findings to see "who was there first"
http://www.archaeology.org/9701/etc/specialreport.html
http://www.s-t.com/daily/04-96/04-29-96/1amummy.htm
http://www.rense.com/general28/weks.htm
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=358001
=================================
Might I respectfully recommend
'The Inequality of Human Races' by Count Arthur de Gobineau.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...692523-8426862
Written in 1852, Gobineau meticulously documents the causes for the rise and fall of civilizations and concludes that race-mixing is the cause for the downfall of empires.
He also concludes that the Negro and Mongoloid races are truly wretched and have only ever achieved civilization when their blood have been admixtured with that of the Aryans -
========================================
The Savaged States of America: A Futuristic Fantasy
by Kevin Beary
A balkanized America divided and ruled by crazed feminists and minorities
run amok: it may sound a lot like the present, but this brilliantly written
novel blends satire and outrage in a searing, Orwellian portrait of a future
America -- an America that may soon be upon us. How Shakespeare's Julius
Caesar reads as translated into Ebonics by the black despot of
"Malcolmland"; how the cringing, chemically castrated white men of the
(Northeastern) "Corridor" keep house as their wives rule the roost; banquets
of "mystery meat," Aztec-style, in the new "Aztlan"; the poignant expiry of
the last traces of the old timers' old America in the shadow of the Statue
of Liberty. Beary writes with unsparing frankness on sex as practiced in a
decaying America, while his fine ear for comic dialogue and sharp eye for
excruciating detail bring the horrors of multiculturalism into Swiftian
focus.
Pb; 323 pp; $10.00.
Noontide Press
=========================================
If you're a typical VICE reader, you're about halfway through elementary school-or maybe you're a member of the magazine's ever-expanding preschool readership.
Either way, you're very young, and your mind and sexuality are easily molded by bad people who want to hurt you.
There are a lot of bad people in the American educational system who are being forced by a lot of bad people in the financial world to tell you a lot of bad facts about history that are designed to make you feel bad about yourself.
This is especially true if you're a WHITE schoolchild.
If you're white like Uncle Jim, your teachers will try to convince you that you're responsible-even though you're only, what?, eight years old?-for a bunch of bad, bad things that happened a long, long time ago.
If you're a black schoolchild, I'm sure your parents will have plenty of excuses for why your ancestors were enslaved.
But chances are that you're white-at least for the next generation or two, those are the chances-so I've collected a bunch of DUMB MYTHS and SMART FACTS about slavery that you can use to clown your teachers and everyone else at school!
------------------------------------
Dumb Myth:
Slavery is a bad, dirty thing that only happened to black people in America before the Civil War.
Smart Fact:
Black slavery in America was pretty bad, kids, but it wasn't anything special. Throughout history, every color of the rainbow has owned slaves and been enslaved.
The dictionary tells us that the root word of "slave" is "Slav," because Slavic peoples-who are REALLY pale and white- were the primary slave population throughout the Middle Ages.
And though your teachers will never tell you this, there have been long stretches of history where Africans have owned white people as slaves!
How do you like THEM apples? The [racially white] empire of Carthage transported white slaves to Africa. The [black / Arab] African Moors ruled Spain for 500 years and sent white Christian slaves to [white / Arab] Egypt [where the white slaves, primarily from the Caucasus, eventually through a coup and seized control of the government]. And poor, defenseless white kids-just like you!-were kidnapped by Muslims during the Children's Crusade and sold into Egyptian slavery.
-----------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth:
White European Christians were solely responsible for the African slave trade.
Smart Fact:
No, kids-the blacks, Arabs, and Jews were involved, too.
• BLACKS: The president of an African country called Benin recently apologized to American blacks for his country's role in the slave trade.
Slavery was common throughout Africa, with entire tribes becoming enslaved after losing battles. Tribal chieftains often sold their defeated foes to white slave-traders.
In the late 1700s, a freed black American slave named Ottobah Cugoano wrote, "I was first kidnapped and betrayed by my own complexion, who were the first cause of my exile and slavery."
• ARABS: The word "Abed" means "slave" in Arabic. It also means "black."
The "Holy Land" of the Middle East has hosted far more African slaves than North America ever did.
• JEWS: The oldest synagogue in America was built by Aaron Lopez, a Jewish slave trader. Jewish writers such as Cecil Roth, Wilfred Samuels, Seymour B. Liebman, and Moshe Kahan acknowledge that Jews were involved in all levels of the African slave trade.
In fact, children, white Christians were the first group to make a
concerted effort to ABOLISH slavery.
-----------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: America's a uniquely evil place because it imported all those slaves from Africa.
Smart Fact: Of the 10 to 15 million Africans who were transplanted to the New World, no more than 6 percent-around 400,000-went to the Northern Hemisphere. Almost all of them went to South America, but you don't see your teachers giving Brazil a hard time, do you?
------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: Most whites owned slaves, so every white person shares guilt for American slavery.
Smart Fact: Blacks were never close to a majority in America [though they were, and are, a majority in some parts of the South], so it's mathematically impossible for most whites to have owned black slaves. At the peak of black slavery in the South, only 6 percent of Southern whites owned slaves. If you include the white people in the North, it means that only 1.4 percent of white Americans owned black slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery.
-------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: Blacks never owned slaves in America.
Smart Fact: An estimated 3,000 blacks owned a total of 20,000 black slaves in the year 1860. One study concluded that 28 percent of free blacks owned slaves, which is a far higher percentage than that of free whites who owned slaves.
------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: There were no white slaves in America.
Smart Fact: Although your textbooks are silent about it, most historians agree that two-thirds of ALL whites came to the colonies in some form of bondage. Legal papers on both sides of the ocean referred to them as "slaves." White slaves outnumbered black slaves in America throughout the 1600s.
-----------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: White "Indentured Servants" chose to come here and weren't treated as badly as black slaves.
Smart Fact: Hundreds of thousands of white slaves were kidnapped and brought to America; their middle-passage death rates were comparable to those of black slaves; they were sold at auction and traded for livestock, they were routinely beaten-sometimes to death-and an estimated one half of them died before gaining freedom. It's possible that more whites came to America against their will than blacks.
Historians from both ends of the political spectrum say that white
slaves were treated worse than black slaves [because they weren't
property, and their children weren't property, and thus there was no
incentive to maintain them longer than the term of their servitude.]
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: England only sent convict laborers to Australia.
Smart Fact: England only started sending convicts to Australia in 1776- when the American Revolution made it impossible for them to continue sending their convicts here. By 1776, more than 50,000 convict slave laborers had already been sent to America. That's a lotta criminals, kids!
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: White people need to pay financial reparations to black people.
Smart Fact: American blacks enjoy the highest standard of living of any black population on earth. Their average per capita income is TWENTY to FIFTY times higher than in any of the African countries from where they were displaced. It's [not] true that part of America's wealth was built on black slavery; it is also true that American blacks are enjoying the fruits of that wealth. You, fair child, whether you were born black or white, weren't born in debt to anyone. You were born free. Don't let the bad people take it away from you.
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: The Civil War was fought to end slavery.
Smart Fact: When General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Ulysses S. Grant, it had been nearly 20 years since Lee owned slaves-he freed his slaves in the late 1840s. In 1856, five years before the Civil War started, he wrote that slavery was "a moral and political evil." On the other hand, General Grant STILL owned slaves at the end of the Civil War, because Abe Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation cleverly outlawed slavery only in the South. Grant had stated that he would refuse to fight if he thought the war had anything to do with slavery. And hey, kids, even if it WAS fought to end slavery, how often do you see the descendants of slaves thanking the 600,000 or so white soldiers who died in the fight to free them?
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: Slavery ended with the Civil War.
Smart Fact: The US government estimates that 50,000 humans are brought into this country every year for the purpose of forced labor. Various agencies estimate that there are anywhere from 27 to 200 million humans currently enslaved worldwide. (Compare this to only four and a half million slaves at American slavery's peak.) Most of these slaves live in South Asia, Africa, and South America. Their labor comes far cheaper and is much more profitable than black American slavery was. In many horrifying cases, poverty-stricken women sell their vaginas on the black market and become lifelong sex slaves to fat, stinky men for as little as $1,500. In today's dollars, a black slave in the American South cost approximately $40,000.
Remember, kids-the enemy's all around you, and he comes in all colors.
Slavery exists in so many ways, children. Open your eyes before they shackle your asses.
Jim Goad goes more into detail in his book The Redneck Manifesto.
See more of the facts on this from Jim Goad's book here.
================================
Citing the official US Census of 1830, there were 3,775 free blacks who owned 12,740 black slaves.
Furthermore, the story outlines the history of slavery here, and the first slave owner, the Father of American slavery, was Mr Anthony Johnson, of Northampton, Virginia.
His slave was John Casor, the first slave for life. Both were black Africans. The story is very readable, and outlines cases of free black women owning their husbands, free black parents selling their children into slavery to white owners, and absentee free black slave owners, who leased their slaves to plantation owners.-"Selling Poor Steven", American Heritage Magazine, Feb/Mar 1993 (Vol. 441) p 90 ========================================================
Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
http://www.nazigassings.com
====================================
Of course, a full telling of Black History would not be complete without a telling of the origin of slavery in the Virginia colony:Virginia, Guide to The Old Dominion, WPA Writers' Program, Oxford University Press,
NY, 1940, p. 378
"In 1650 there were only 300 negroes in Virginia, about one percent of the population.
They weren't slaves any more than the approximately 4,000 white indentured servants working out their loans for passage money to Virginia, and who were granted 50 acres each when freed from their indentures, so they could raise their own tobacco.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240140/posts
=============================================================================
BLACK SLAVEOWNERS
http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
Child slavery today in West Africa?
http://gbgm-umc.org/nwo/99ja/child.html
Slavery throughout history
http://www.freetheslaves.net/slavery_today/slavery.html
==============================================================================
Racial Myths and Realities
Myth #3
Lynching was another racist American institution that viscous whites inflicted upon innocent blacks.
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3570
==============================================================================
In 1670, Virginia passed a law forbidding Negroes from buying white people..Free Negroes bought white people in such numbers in Louisiana that the state made a similar law in 1818.
=====================================================================
Who Took the Slaves to America?
Slave Ship Owner(s)
Abigail Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Franks
Crown Isaac Levy, Nathan Simpson
Nassau Moses Levy
Four Sisters Moses Levy
Anne & Eliza Justus Bosch, John Abrams
Prudent Betty Henry Cruger, Jacob Pheonix
Hester Mordecai & David Gomez
Elizabeth Mordecai & David Gomez
Antigua Nathan Marston, Abram Lyell
Betsy Wm. De Woolf
Polly James De Woolf
White Horse Jan de Sweevts
Expedition John & Jacob Roosevelt
Charlotte Moses & Sam Levy, Jacob Franks
Caracoa Moses & Sam Levy
http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html
===================================================
Remind me who is apologizing for slavery again?
This is a lengthy article, but well worth the time. It states who was a major force in the slave trades of early Africa and Europe and on up to the US trade as well. This should clear up any "white guilt" fence sitters may have. Lots of facts in this article that should be made public in our schools and media. Just one more effort at correcting history. Check the link.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/08slave.htm
----------------------------------------
Rape for Profit of White "Gentile"Women by Jews:
http://www.wakeupordie.com/html/action/jewsrape/raperef4.html
White Slavery
==========================
Happy 'Indigenous Peoples Day'
Multiracialist transformation of Columbus Day is a salvo in war against White people.
Thus it is transparent anti-White racism to create a holiday where Whites are asked to feel guilt for the crimes of fellow Whites but the other races are exempted from the same moral reflection and instead play the role of accusers.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4006
=\========================
A quarter of a century living daily with Asians.
Maybe you've seen my new thread about the (two-thirds Asian) state of Hawaii having the highest theft-larceny rate in all 50 states:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...threadid=25476
-------------------------
The unemployment rate in China is 50%, yet we're to believe they're they greatest civilization on Earth (according to what their government and culture teaches their people.)
--------------------
Japan's bond rating is currently at the same level as Botswana's:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...ght=botswan a
----------------
Here's a story about a filipino with a GED who got nominated to attend the US Air Force Academy, but got shot dead in an alley first:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...&threadid=8450
The Japanese American Citizens League is one of the 180 socialist and socialist-leaning orgs which sponser the "I AM an American" mindwashings.
Several other oriental orgs participate too.
If I go to China or Japan or Korea or the Philippines and live there for 30 years- the peoples of those countries will not be knocking themselves out to insist that I am a Chinese, a Japanese, a Korean, or a Filipino.
The very notion is ridiculous! -
As much so as it is ridiculous that you- an oriental- are a Westerner or a Canadian or an American.
You may hold the passport, and be able to vote...but you will never be a Westerner- nor have you ever been a Westerner!
Many White Canadians sorely regret having allowed Chinese to emigrate to Canada by ponying up money.
Canada is still lucky they are 83% White.
I've a lot of personal experience with America's Radical Minorities- Chinese, Korean, Filipino, Japanese etc.
===============================
The extinction of the Australian pygmies
Keith Windschuttle and Tim Gillin
Quadrant
June 2002
From the 1940s until the 1960s, it was fairly widely known there were pygmies in Australia.
(http://www.sydneyline.com/Pygmies%20...tion.htm)click link for pics
=============================================
Doctored evidence and invented incidents in Aboriginal historiography (www.sydneyline.com, Australia)
['Doctored evidence and invented incidents in Aboriginal historiography' by Keith Windschuttle.
( http://www.sydneyline.com/National%2...20Conflict.htm) Paper to conference on 'Frontier Conflict, National Museum of Australia, December 13-14, 2001.
See also K. Windschuttle's web page about the National Museum of Australia.]
Frontier Conflict(http://www.nma.gov.au/frontierconflict/) - the Australian Experience (National Museum of Australia, Australia) [A forum at the National Museum of Australia, Canberra, Thursday 13 - Friday 14 December 2001.
Much debate surrounds the history of conflict between Aboriginals and Europeans on the Australian frontier.
What actually happened?
What is the evidence?
How do we interpret it?
How do we remember the histories of conflict?
Why is the debate significant today?
In this two-day Forum, leading historians, social commentators and community leaders confront the issues from diverse perspectives.]
The Fabrication of Aboriginal History ( http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dis...ndschuttle.htm)- Reviews of Keith Windschuttle's new book (www.adelaideinstitute.org, Australia) [A number of articles, including: 'Paul Sheehan Our history not rewritten but put right.
Accusations of genocide have been based on guesswork and blatant ideology. Sydney Morning Herald, 24 November 2002.'
The site provides a section 'Keith Windschuttle replies to his critics'.]
Discussion of Gary Johns' paper,
'The Failure of Aboriginal Separatism'
Keith Windschuttle
One of those responsible for Palm Island was the Reverend Ernest Gribble. He had earlier been in Western Australia and was the missionary who reported the story of the Forrest River "massacre" in the Kimberley district in 1926.
As the Perth journalist, Rod Moran, has shown in his 1999 book Massacre Myth, Gribble was an emotionally disturbed man who fabricated most of the evidence on which the claims of a massacre were made. But Gribble is another of the heroes of Reynolds' book, This Whispering in Our Hearts.
Reynolds treats him simply as a whistle-blower about violence towards Aborigines and fails to discuss his role in Aboriginal policy
http://www.bennelong.com.au/papers/W...uttle2000.html
===============================================
Whitewash confirms the fabrication of Aboriginal history, Quadrant, October 2003
http://www.sydneyline.com/Manne%20debate%20Quadrant.htm
================================================== ====
No Slander in Exposing Cultural Brutality
Another critic, the Tasmanian academic Shayne Breen, who labels Fabrication a "character assassination", nonetheless admits that Aboriginal women were traded to whites, as I recorded.
"There is some evidence that Aboriginal men, especially along the northern and south-eastern coastlines, used women as trading commodities,"
Breen writes. "Some of this trading was culturally sanctioned, some of it was not. Sometimes women willingly participated, sometimes they did not."
Aboriginal people are made from the same crooked timber as the rest of us. It is no slander to identify cultural practices they should leave behind.
Perpetuating a romantic view of hunter-gatherer society, which historically was just as bloody and brutish in Australia as on every other continent, does not serve reconciliation, which must eventually mean some kind of integration into modern, mainstream life.
The fabrication of history serves the interests of no one, except those white and black political and academic activists who have lived off its misrepresentations for far too long.
http://www.sydneyline.com/Fabricatio...0year%20on.htm
================================================== ========
Error nullius
To achieve reconciliation we don’t need history books - constant refrains of past wrongs. Reconciliation is not possible between us and the people of 1788 but it may be touched by Australians alive in 2003.
We may never be able to take politics out of history, but we can certainly take historians out of the courtrooms.
In the beginning, they say, was terra nullius - it wasn’t. And reconciliation is too important to be erected on such a shoddy foundation.
Mistakes in universities have effects in the real world.
Academics have shouldered a fashionable burden of guilt, but it’s time to put it down. Misled by one phrase, we imagine we know what happened at settlement when we don’t, and those we should be able to rely on are useless guides.
Reconciliation needs less confrontation and more goodwill: a history written in terms of goodies and baddies cannot be the basis for satisfying political aspirations of the 21st century.
http://bulletin.ninemsn.com.au/bulle...9?OpenDocument
================================================== ===
Enduring myth of 'noble savage' vs. a special at continuous war?
review by Keith Windschuttle of Steven A. LeBlanc, Constant Battles: The Myth of the Peaceful Noble Savage, in Washington Times, August 17 2003 (http://washingtontimes.com/books/200...5047-3673r.htm)
==================================================
"History as a Travesty of the Truth", The Australian, December 9 2002
http://www.sydneyline.com/History%20...of%20Truth.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: Volume One, Van Diemen's Land 1803-1847, Macleay Press
http://www.sydneyline.com/Fabricatio...%20History.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Ten: Aborigines killed by whites, Van Diemen's Land 1803-1834. Revised version
http://www.sydneyline.com/Table%20Ten%20revised.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Eight: Aboriginal killings by colonists recorded by G. A. Robinson, 1829-1839
http://www.sydneyline.com/Table%20Eight%20revised.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Doctored Evidence and Invented Incidents in Aboriginal Historiography", Paper to conference on Frontier Conflict, National Museum of Australia, December 13-14, 2001
http://www.sydneyline.com/National%2...20Conflict.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"When History Falls Victim to Politics", The Age, 14 July, 2001
http://www.sydneyline.com/Evans%20an...pe%20reply.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Black, White and Grey: the Truth about our Past", by Robert Murray, The Age, 13 July 2001
http://www.theage.com.au/news/state/...XNRWZE1PC.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Wrong on Mistake Creek", Australian Financial Review, 18 June 2001
http://www.sydneyline.com/Mistake%20Creek.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Selected Readings", The Australian's Review of Books, April 2001 (reply to Henry Reynolds' article in March 2001)
http://www.sydneyline.com/ARB%20reply%20April%2001.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Exposing academic deception of past wrongs", Sydney Morning Herald, 19 September 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Exposing%2...Deceptions.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"The myths of frontier massacres in Australian history, Part I:
The invention of massacre stories", Quadrant, October 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Massacres%20Part%20One.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The myths of frontier massacres in Australian history, Part II: The fabrication of the Aboriginal death toll", Quadrant, November 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Massacres%20Part%20Two.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The myths of frontier massacres in Australian history, Part III: Massacre stories and the policy of separatism", Quadrant, December 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Massacres%20Part%20Three.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washout: On the academic response to the Fabrication of Aboriginal History, by John Dawson. The latest front in the history wars, published December 2004. [launch speech by John Dawson]
http://www.macleaypress.com/Washout.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Killing of History
The Killing of History: How Literary Critics and Social Theorists are Murdering Our Past, revised international edition, Macleay Press, 1996
http://www.macleaypress.com/Killing%20of%20History.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History, truth and postmodernism",
The Great Debate, HSC Extension History, [Keith Windschuttle, Richard Evans and Behan McCullagh vs. Stephen Garton, Joy Damousi and Dirk Moses], University of New South Wales, 27 July 2002
http://www.sydneyline.com/HSC%20History%20talk.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History, Truth and Tribalism",
Lecture for The Historical Society at University of Chicago, November 28, 2001 and Ashbrook Center, Ashland University, Ohio, November 26, 2001 [text] ... [audio version](http://www.sydneyline.com/History%20...0Tribalism.htm)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Real Stuff of History",
The New Criterion, March 1997; reprinted in Hilton Kramer and Roger Kimball (eds.) The Future of the European Past, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago, 1997
http://www.sydneyline.com/Real%20Stu...%20History.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Killing of History", by Roger Kimball, The New Criterion, September 1996
http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/...96/history.htm#
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History must prevail against challenge of cultural studies", The Australian, Higher Education Supplement, November 23 1994
http://www.sydneyline.com/Killing%20HES%201994.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
White Australia and Sixties-generation historians
In the entire period from 1803 when the colonists first arrived in Tasmania, to 1834 when all but one family of Aborigines had been removed to Flinders Island, my calculation is that the British were responsible for killing only 121 of the original inhabitants, mostly in self defence or in hot pursuit of Aborigines who had just assaulted white households. In these incidents, the Aborigines killed 187 colonists.
In all of Europe's colonial encounters with the New Worlds of the Americas and the Pacific, the colony of Van Diemen's Land was probably the site where the least indigenous blood of all was deliberately shed.
Why, then, have the historians of Tasmania told this story about genocide, frontier warfare and widespread bloodshed. I suggest several of the reasons in my book: to make Australian history, which would otherwise be dull and uneventful, seem more dramatic than it really was; to assume the moral high ground and flatter their own vanity as defenders of the Aborigines; in some cases to pursue a traditional Marxist agenda or to indulge in interest group politics of gender, race and class.
In contrast, the proper role of the historian is to try to stand above politics, difficult though this always will be.
Historians should assume a public responsibility to report their evidence fully and accurately, to cite their sources honestly, and to adopt as objective a stand as possible.
To pretend that acceptable interpretations can be drawn from false or non-existent or deceptively selective evidence is to abandon the pursuit of historical truth altogether.
http://www.sydneyline.com/White%20Australia%20and%20Sixties%20generation.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Windschuttle, ABC Classic FM interview by Jana Wendt, December 8 2004
http://www.abc.net.au/classic/throsby
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
White Australia's Myths, The Australian, December 6 2004 [full text] -- [more in Sydney Morning Herald] --[Tim Blair comments]
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/...html?from=top5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Myth of South Sea blackbirding [The Australian on South Sea blackbirding] -- [more on blackbirding myth]
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E2702,00.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Windschuttle, launch speech, The White Australia Policy, December 6 2004
http://www.sydneyline.com/WAP%20launch%20speech.htm
The White Australia Policy is nothing to be proud of, but nor is it anything before which we should cringe or apologise.
Australia is not, and never has been, a fundamentally racist country.
The race card, which the academic left has played for all its moral worth for the last thirty years, is a ring-in that should be dropped from political debate.
But, unfortunately, no one should hold their breath waiting for that to happen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Devine, launch speech, The White Australia Policy and Washout: On the academic respnse to the fabrication of Aboriginal history, December 6 2004
http://www.sydneyline.com/Frank%20De...h%20speech.htm
Keith considers the depiction of racism as the dominant force in Australian history to be a concoction of the past 50 years, by historians sacrificing scholarly discipline to ideology.
Their relentless campaign to make Australians "shudder with vicarious guilt at the colonial past" -- Eric Richard's phrase -- has been politically debilitating.
It has enabled constant denigration as "racist" of reasoned argument against approved positions on multiculturalism, immigration, aboriginal affairs, foreign relations and more.
With his new book, Keith Windschuttle adds momentum to the comment of Emeritus Professor Claudio Veliz, of Boston University, when he launched Fabrication in 2002 :
"It will change the course of Australia's intellectual history."
This is heroic work. May it continue.
==================================
The "goddess" Athena
Athena was a "goddess": with testicles.
Athena was a Caucasian who lived in Crete 5,000 years ago.
"The Parthenon" in Tennessee is a jew racist FRAUD.
Modern Greeks are descendants of the Arabs who left no stone unturned when they raped and pillaged ancient Greeks.
Click Athena to view the Athena Forum, click the jew to see the difference:
What the following story from racist jew Goetz-controlled Microsoft (who also "thinks" Hannibal was a nigger) "forgot" to include in the following article was a PICTURE of the "life size" statue of the "goddess" Athena which was just discovered in a 5,000 year old city in Crete. Had they done so, they would have discovered that this "goddess" has testicles (something jew Goetz clearly doesn't).
http://jacobisrael.us/athena.htm
This "goddess" also has very masculine hands, face, and arms which don't look at all like a "goddess"--suggesting that the jew-controlled media is misrepresenting at LEAST this part of Greek "mythology", just as they're misrepresenting the racial appearance of people from the "middle East". THIS "GODDESS" IS A CAUCASIAN.
=====================
Amazons
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_amazon/
http://www.chicagotribune.com/featur...,2289031.story
Looks like savage Mongol/Turkic nomads owe their horseriding ability and much of their art to Aryans.
This nine-year-old Mongolian girl, Meiramgul, is blond and may share genetic traits with the ancient Sarmations.
To uncover the genetic link between nine-year-old Meiramgul, the blond child of the mountains of western Mongolia, and the long-dead women warriors of the Eurasian steppes, researchers examined snippets of a particular type of genetic information called mitochondrial DNA.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Genetic Memory
http://www.questinstitute.co.uk/dynamic/resources/memory.pdf
http://cognews.com/1058835591/index_html
http://viceland.com/issu%20es/v12n5/htdocs/hey.php
We know now that some slaveholders held multiple slaves, we also know now that of the 261,988 free blacks over 28% held slaves, that would be over 68,000 slaveholders.
We also know now that the jews were large slaveholders, 75% of jews owning black slaves. That would mean they had over 150,000 slaveholders (based on a jewish population estimated at 200,000 in 1860).
This means that between the blacks and jews they accounted for 218,000 slaveholders out of a total of 385,000 slave owners.
In fact this means that fewer than 150,000 whites out of a population of 27,000,000 owned slaves, or around 0.5% compared with 75% of jews and 28% of blacks.
Shocked?
Not only were whites not the greatest slave holders per capita, in fact we were not even the majority of slaveholders, these were non-whites.
So remind me again why we're meant to feel guilty?
slavery would not have existed in the Americas without the jews.
2. Who was it who captured the slaves?
======================================
Read What General Lee's Negro Slave Has To Say About Him
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"I was raised by one of the greatest men in the world. There was never one born of a woman greater than Gen. Robert E. Lee, according to my judgment. All of his servants were set free ten years before the war, but all remained on the plantation until after the surrender."
"My master, at his death, left me $360 to educate myself with."
The fact that the war had set him free was of small moment to him, and he stayed with his old master until his death.
"Having stayed on Marse Robert's plantation 18 years after the war and with limited schooling, I am not ashamed to give my history to the world that it might cause some of the young negroes who have school advantages from childhood and early youth, to consider life more seriously and if men of my type had lived in their time, how far they would exceed them along lines of religious, educational and business activities."
[These are words written by William Mack Lee in his autobiography which he wrote to help raise funds for his church. Despite the false claims that many negro slaves suffered at the hands of their White masters, we have here a firsthand account from a freed negro slave that points to the contrary.] SOURCE: Autobiography of Rev. William Mack Lee
For those of you who question whether any source provided by WN is credible, I remind you that the above link points to an University Of North Carolina (UNC) website.
http://docsouth.unc.edu/leewilliam/lee.html
======================
It is a fact that while there were some instances of slave abuse, most slaves regarded their masters similarly. I believe that this is a historical point of fact that will reveal itself eventually as the accepted alternative is simply too fictitious to stand indefinitely.
It is also a fact that black slaveowners in many instances were much harder on their slaves than white slaveowners; a subtlety in history that may come to public light if society will ever recognize that black people in fact were slaveowners.
I would encourage everyone to get a copy of "The South Was Right!) if they have not done so already. It demonstrates the point here among other things and is a very easy read. Here's some examples of slave sentiment from the Works Projects Administration's journals interviewing ex-slaves during the late 30's -a project hidden under the rug after it was discovered that the majority of slaves felt this way:
Simon Phillips, AL
"People has the wrong idea of slave days. We was treated good. My Massa never laid a hand on me the whole time I was wid him...Sometime we loaned the massa money when he was hard pushed."
Mary Rice, AL
"I was happy all de time in slavery days, but dere ain't much to git happy over now...."
Sarah and Tom Douglas, AL
"Slavery times wuz sho good times. We wuz fed an' clothed an' had nothin to worry about..."
And as for the war....
Gus Brown, Richmond VA
"The Yankees didn't beat us, we wuz starved out!....I am a Confederate Veteran."
James Gill, Marvell, AR
"...all dem good times ceasted atter a while when de War come and de Yankees started all dere debbilment [devilment]. Us was Confederates all de while....But de Yankees, dey didn't know dat we was Confederates....When de Yankees ud come dey would ax [ask] my mammy, 'Aunt Mary, is you seen any Se-sesch [secessionists] today?' and mammy, sheud say, 'Now-suh' eben iffen she had seen some of us mens, but when any our sojers ud come and say 'Aunt Mary, is you seen any Yankees 'round here recent?' she ud allus [always] tell dem de truf."
It's hard to get more authoritative than this -interviews conducted by representatives of the vanquishing government. Of course the reason this hasn't come to public light in any real way is because the responses weren't exactly what they had in mind when they began their little project.
---------------------------
Simon Philips, AL
People has the wrong idea of slave days. We was treated good. My Massa never laid a hand on me the whole time I was wid him....Sometime we loaned the massa money when he was hard pushed."
Elijah Henry Hopkins, Little Rock, AR
"I was fed just like I was one of the [master's] children. They even done put me to bed with them. You see, this discrimination on color wasn't as bad then as it is now. They handled you as a slave but they didn't discriminate against you on account of color like they do now. In slavery times, a poor white man was worse off than a nigger."
Sarah and Tom Douglas, AL
"Slavery times wuz sho good times. We wuz fed an' clothed an' had nothin to worry about..."
Jane Georgiana, AL
"Ole Marster dead an' gone an' Ole Mistis too, but I 'members 'em jus' lak dey was, when dey looked atter us whenst we belonged to 'em or dey belong to us, I dunno which it was...De times was better fo' de war....I goes to church an' sings an' prays, an' when de good Lord teks me, I'se ready to go, en I specs to see Jesus an' Ole Mistis an' Ole Martser when I gits to de he'benly land!"
Gus Brown, Richmond VA
"I cannot forget old massa. He was good and kind. He never believed in slavery, but his money was tied up in slaves and he didn't want to lose all he had. I knows I will see him in heaven and even though I have to walk ten miles for a bite of bread, I can still be happy to think about the good times we had then."
one last one...
Cora Gillam, Little Rock, AR
"I'll tell you lady, if the rough element from the North had stayed out of the South the trouble of reconstruction would not have happened....they tried to excite the colored against their white friends. The white folks was still kind to them what had been their slaves. They would have helped them get started. I know that. I always say that if the South could of been left to adjust itself both white and colored would have been better off."
I have many more of these if I haven't yet shattered your fallacious vision of Southern history as "Roots".
Maybe next February, Stormfront should encourage the enlightenment of Black Americans by providing real instances of black history.
======================
ANOTHER MYTH BUSTER..
COLONIALISM WAS THE REASON FOR AFRICANS TROUBLES.
Martin Meredith in his book The Fate of Africa: From the Hopes of Freedom to the Heart of Despair.
Africans are clearly to blame for their own problems.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1586482467/102-7083961-2564956?v=glance
======================================
How to deal with the Native American argument?
Whites were actually there first! Those who go back hundereds of years can also go back thousands
Check these findings to see "who was there first"
http://www.archaeology.org/9701/etc/specialreport.html
http://www.s-t.com/daily/04-96/04-29-96/1amummy.htm
http://www.rense.com/general28/weks.htm
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=358001
=================================
Might I respectfully recommend
'The Inequality of Human Races' by Count Arthur de Gobineau.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...692523-8426862
Written in 1852, Gobineau meticulously documents the causes for the rise and fall of civilizations and concludes that race-mixing is the cause for the downfall of empires.
He also concludes that the Negro and Mongoloid races are truly wretched and have only ever achieved civilization when their blood have been admixtured with that of the Aryans -
========================================
The Savaged States of America: A Futuristic Fantasy
by Kevin Beary
A balkanized America divided and ruled by crazed feminists and minorities
run amok: it may sound a lot like the present, but this brilliantly written
novel blends satire and outrage in a searing, Orwellian portrait of a future
America -- an America that may soon be upon us. How Shakespeare's Julius
Caesar reads as translated into Ebonics by the black despot of
"Malcolmland"; how the cringing, chemically castrated white men of the
(Northeastern) "Corridor" keep house as their wives rule the roost; banquets
of "mystery meat," Aztec-style, in the new "Aztlan"; the poignant expiry of
the last traces of the old timers' old America in the shadow of the Statue
of Liberty. Beary writes with unsparing frankness on sex as practiced in a
decaying America, while his fine ear for comic dialogue and sharp eye for
excruciating detail bring the horrors of multiculturalism into Swiftian
focus.
Pb; 323 pp; $10.00.
Noontide Press
=========================================
If you're a typical VICE reader, you're about halfway through elementary school-or maybe you're a member of the magazine's ever-expanding preschool readership.
Either way, you're very young, and your mind and sexuality are easily molded by bad people who want to hurt you.
There are a lot of bad people in the American educational system who are being forced by a lot of bad people in the financial world to tell you a lot of bad facts about history that are designed to make you feel bad about yourself.
This is especially true if you're a WHITE schoolchild.
If you're white like Uncle Jim, your teachers will try to convince you that you're responsible-even though you're only, what?, eight years old?-for a bunch of bad, bad things that happened a long, long time ago.
If you're a black schoolchild, I'm sure your parents will have plenty of excuses for why your ancestors were enslaved.
But chances are that you're white-at least for the next generation or two, those are the chances-so I've collected a bunch of DUMB MYTHS and SMART FACTS about slavery that you can use to clown your teachers and everyone else at school!
------------------------------------
Dumb Myth:
Slavery is a bad, dirty thing that only happened to black people in America before the Civil War.
Smart Fact:
Black slavery in America was pretty bad, kids, but it wasn't anything special. Throughout history, every color of the rainbow has owned slaves and been enslaved.
The dictionary tells us that the root word of "slave" is "Slav," because Slavic peoples-who are REALLY pale and white- were the primary slave population throughout the Middle Ages.
And though your teachers will never tell you this, there have been long stretches of history where Africans have owned white people as slaves!
How do you like THEM apples? The [racially white] empire of Carthage transported white slaves to Africa. The [black / Arab] African Moors ruled Spain for 500 years and sent white Christian slaves to [white / Arab] Egypt [where the white slaves, primarily from the Caucasus, eventually through a coup and seized control of the government]. And poor, defenseless white kids-just like you!-were kidnapped by Muslims during the Children's Crusade and sold into Egyptian slavery.
-----------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth:
White European Christians were solely responsible for the African slave trade.
Smart Fact:
No, kids-the blacks, Arabs, and Jews were involved, too.
• BLACKS: The president of an African country called Benin recently apologized to American blacks for his country's role in the slave trade.
Slavery was common throughout Africa, with entire tribes becoming enslaved after losing battles. Tribal chieftains often sold their defeated foes to white slave-traders.
In the late 1700s, a freed black American slave named Ottobah Cugoano wrote, "I was first kidnapped and betrayed by my own complexion, who were the first cause of my exile and slavery."
• ARABS: The word "Abed" means "slave" in Arabic. It also means "black."
The "Holy Land" of the Middle East has hosted far more African slaves than North America ever did.
• JEWS: The oldest synagogue in America was built by Aaron Lopez, a Jewish slave trader. Jewish writers such as Cecil Roth, Wilfred Samuels, Seymour B. Liebman, and Moshe Kahan acknowledge that Jews were involved in all levels of the African slave trade.
In fact, children, white Christians were the first group to make a
concerted effort to ABOLISH slavery.
-----------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: America's a uniquely evil place because it imported all those slaves from Africa.
Smart Fact: Of the 10 to 15 million Africans who were transplanted to the New World, no more than 6 percent-around 400,000-went to the Northern Hemisphere. Almost all of them went to South America, but you don't see your teachers giving Brazil a hard time, do you?
------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: Most whites owned slaves, so every white person shares guilt for American slavery.
Smart Fact: Blacks were never close to a majority in America [though they were, and are, a majority in some parts of the South], so it's mathematically impossible for most whites to have owned black slaves. At the peak of black slavery in the South, only 6 percent of Southern whites owned slaves. If you include the white people in the North, it means that only 1.4 percent of white Americans owned black slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery.
-------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: Blacks never owned slaves in America.
Smart Fact: An estimated 3,000 blacks owned a total of 20,000 black slaves in the year 1860. One study concluded that 28 percent of free blacks owned slaves, which is a far higher percentage than that of free whites who owned slaves.
------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: There were no white slaves in America.
Smart Fact: Although your textbooks are silent about it, most historians agree that two-thirds of ALL whites came to the colonies in some form of bondage. Legal papers on both sides of the ocean referred to them as "slaves." White slaves outnumbered black slaves in America throughout the 1600s.
-----------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: White "Indentured Servants" chose to come here and weren't treated as badly as black slaves.
Smart Fact: Hundreds of thousands of white slaves were kidnapped and brought to America; their middle-passage death rates were comparable to those of black slaves; they were sold at auction and traded for livestock, they were routinely beaten-sometimes to death-and an estimated one half of them died before gaining freedom. It's possible that more whites came to America against their will than blacks.
Historians from both ends of the political spectrum say that white
slaves were treated worse than black slaves [because they weren't
property, and their children weren't property, and thus there was no
incentive to maintain them longer than the term of their servitude.]
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: England only sent convict laborers to Australia.
Smart Fact: England only started sending convicts to Australia in 1776- when the American Revolution made it impossible for them to continue sending their convicts here. By 1776, more than 50,000 convict slave laborers had already been sent to America. That's a lotta criminals, kids!
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: White people need to pay financial reparations to black people.
Smart Fact: American blacks enjoy the highest standard of living of any black population on earth. Their average per capita income is TWENTY to FIFTY times higher than in any of the African countries from where they were displaced. It's [not] true that part of America's wealth was built on black slavery; it is also true that American blacks are enjoying the fruits of that wealth. You, fair child, whether you were born black or white, weren't born in debt to anyone. You were born free. Don't let the bad people take it away from you.
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: The Civil War was fought to end slavery.
Smart Fact: When General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Ulysses S. Grant, it had been nearly 20 years since Lee owned slaves-he freed his slaves in the late 1840s. In 1856, five years before the Civil War started, he wrote that slavery was "a moral and political evil." On the other hand, General Grant STILL owned slaves at the end of the Civil War, because Abe Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation cleverly outlawed slavery only in the South. Grant had stated that he would refuse to fight if he thought the war had anything to do with slavery. And hey, kids, even if it WAS fought to end slavery, how often do you see the descendants of slaves thanking the 600,000 or so white soldiers who died in the fight to free them?
---------------------------------------------------
Dumb Myth: Slavery ended with the Civil War.
Smart Fact: The US government estimates that 50,000 humans are brought into this country every year for the purpose of forced labor. Various agencies estimate that there are anywhere from 27 to 200 million humans currently enslaved worldwide. (Compare this to only four and a half million slaves at American slavery's peak.) Most of these slaves live in South Asia, Africa, and South America. Their labor comes far cheaper and is much more profitable than black American slavery was. In many horrifying cases, poverty-stricken women sell their vaginas on the black market and become lifelong sex slaves to fat, stinky men for as little as $1,500. In today's dollars, a black slave in the American South cost approximately $40,000.
Remember, kids-the enemy's all around you, and he comes in all colors.
Slavery exists in so many ways, children. Open your eyes before they shackle your asses.
Jim Goad goes more into detail in his book The Redneck Manifesto.
See more of the facts on this from Jim Goad's book here.
================================
Citing the official US Census of 1830, there were 3,775 free blacks who owned 12,740 black slaves.
Furthermore, the story outlines the history of slavery here, and the first slave owner, the Father of American slavery, was Mr Anthony Johnson, of Northampton, Virginia.
His slave was John Casor, the first slave for life. Both were black Africans. The story is very readable, and outlines cases of free black women owning their husbands, free black parents selling their children into slavery to white owners, and absentee free black slave owners, who leased their slaves to plantation owners.-"Selling Poor Steven", American Heritage Magazine, Feb/Mar 1993 (Vol. 441) p 90 ========================================================
Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
http://www.nazigassings.com
====================================
Of course, a full telling of Black History would not be complete without a telling of the origin of slavery in the Virginia colony:Virginia, Guide to The Old Dominion, WPA Writers' Program, Oxford University Press,
NY, 1940, p. 378
"In 1650 there were only 300 negroes in Virginia, about one percent of the population.
They weren't slaves any more than the approximately 4,000 white indentured servants working out their loans for passage money to Virginia, and who were granted 50 acres each when freed from their indentures, so they could raise their own tobacco.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240140/posts
=============================================================================
BLACK SLAVEOWNERS
http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
Child slavery today in West Africa?
http://gbgm-umc.org/nwo/99ja/child.html
Slavery throughout history
http://www.freetheslaves.net/slavery_today/slavery.html
==============================================================================
Racial Myths and Realities
Myth #3
Lynching was another racist American institution that viscous whites inflicted upon innocent blacks.
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3570
==============================================================================
In 1670, Virginia passed a law forbidding Negroes from buying white people..Free Negroes bought white people in such numbers in Louisiana that the state made a similar law in 1818.
=====================================================================
Who Took the Slaves to America?
Slave Ship Owner(s)
Abigail Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Franks
Crown Isaac Levy, Nathan Simpson
Nassau Moses Levy
Four Sisters Moses Levy
Anne & Eliza Justus Bosch, John Abrams
Prudent Betty Henry Cruger, Jacob Pheonix
Hester Mordecai & David Gomez
Elizabeth Mordecai & David Gomez
Antigua Nathan Marston, Abram Lyell
Betsy Wm. De Woolf
Polly James De Woolf
White Horse Jan de Sweevts
Expedition John & Jacob Roosevelt
Charlotte Moses & Sam Levy, Jacob Franks
Caracoa Moses & Sam Levy
http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html
===================================================
Remind me who is apologizing for slavery again?
This is a lengthy article, but well worth the time. It states who was a major force in the slave trades of early Africa and Europe and on up to the US trade as well. This should clear up any "white guilt" fence sitters may have. Lots of facts in this article that should be made public in our schools and media. Just one more effort at correcting history. Check the link.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/08slave.htm
----------------------------------------
Rape for Profit of White "Gentile"Women by Jews:
http://www.wakeupordie.com/html/action/jewsrape/raperef4.html
White Slavery
==========================
Happy 'Indigenous Peoples Day'
Multiracialist transformation of Columbus Day is a salvo in war against White people.
Thus it is transparent anti-White racism to create a holiday where Whites are asked to feel guilt for the crimes of fellow Whites but the other races are exempted from the same moral reflection and instead play the role of accusers.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4006
=\========================
A quarter of a century living daily with Asians.
Maybe you've seen my new thread about the (two-thirds Asian) state of Hawaii having the highest theft-larceny rate in all 50 states:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...threadid=25476
-------------------------
The unemployment rate in China is 50%, yet we're to believe they're they greatest civilization on Earth (according to what their government and culture teaches their people.)
--------------------
Japan's bond rating is currently at the same level as Botswana's:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...ght=botswan a
----------------
Here's a story about a filipino with a GED who got nominated to attend the US Air Force Academy, but got shot dead in an alley first:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...&threadid=8450
The Japanese American Citizens League is one of the 180 socialist and socialist-leaning orgs which sponser the "I AM an American" mindwashings.
Several other oriental orgs participate too.
If I go to China or Japan or Korea or the Philippines and live there for 30 years- the peoples of those countries will not be knocking themselves out to insist that I am a Chinese, a Japanese, a Korean, or a Filipino.
The very notion is ridiculous! -
As much so as it is ridiculous that you- an oriental- are a Westerner or a Canadian or an American.
You may hold the passport, and be able to vote...but you will never be a Westerner- nor have you ever been a Westerner!
Many White Canadians sorely regret having allowed Chinese to emigrate to Canada by ponying up money.
Canada is still lucky they are 83% White.
I've a lot of personal experience with America's Radical Minorities- Chinese, Korean, Filipino, Japanese etc.
===============================
The extinction of the Australian pygmies
Keith Windschuttle and Tim Gillin
Quadrant
June 2002
From the 1940s until the 1960s, it was fairly widely known there were pygmies in Australia.
(http://www.sydneyline.com/Pygmies%20...tion.htm)click link for pics
=============================================
Doctored evidence and invented incidents in Aboriginal historiography (www.sydneyline.com, Australia)
['Doctored evidence and invented incidents in Aboriginal historiography' by Keith Windschuttle.
( http://www.sydneyline.com/National%2...20Conflict.htm) Paper to conference on 'Frontier Conflict, National Museum of Australia, December 13-14, 2001.
See also K. Windschuttle's web page about the National Museum of Australia.]
Frontier Conflict(http://www.nma.gov.au/frontierconflict/) - the Australian Experience (National Museum of Australia, Australia) [A forum at the National Museum of Australia, Canberra, Thursday 13 - Friday 14 December 2001.
Much debate surrounds the history of conflict between Aboriginals and Europeans on the Australian frontier.
What actually happened?
What is the evidence?
How do we interpret it?
How do we remember the histories of conflict?
Why is the debate significant today?
In this two-day Forum, leading historians, social commentators and community leaders confront the issues from diverse perspectives.]
The Fabrication of Aboriginal History ( http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dis...ndschuttle.htm)- Reviews of Keith Windschuttle's new book (www.adelaideinstitute.org, Australia) [A number of articles, including: 'Paul Sheehan Our history not rewritten but put right.
Accusations of genocide have been based on guesswork and blatant ideology. Sydney Morning Herald, 24 November 2002.'
The site provides a section 'Keith Windschuttle replies to his critics'.]
Discussion of Gary Johns' paper,
'The Failure of Aboriginal Separatism'
Keith Windschuttle
One of those responsible for Palm Island was the Reverend Ernest Gribble. He had earlier been in Western Australia and was the missionary who reported the story of the Forrest River "massacre" in the Kimberley district in 1926.
As the Perth journalist, Rod Moran, has shown in his 1999 book Massacre Myth, Gribble was an emotionally disturbed man who fabricated most of the evidence on which the claims of a massacre were made. But Gribble is another of the heroes of Reynolds' book, This Whispering in Our Hearts.
Reynolds treats him simply as a whistle-blower about violence towards Aborigines and fails to discuss his role in Aboriginal policy
http://www.bennelong.com.au/papers/W...uttle2000.html
===============================================
Whitewash confirms the fabrication of Aboriginal history, Quadrant, October 2003
http://www.sydneyline.com/Manne%20debate%20Quadrant.htm
================================================== ====
No Slander in Exposing Cultural Brutality
Another critic, the Tasmanian academic Shayne Breen, who labels Fabrication a "character assassination", nonetheless admits that Aboriginal women were traded to whites, as I recorded.
"There is some evidence that Aboriginal men, especially along the northern and south-eastern coastlines, used women as trading commodities,"
Breen writes. "Some of this trading was culturally sanctioned, some of it was not. Sometimes women willingly participated, sometimes they did not."
Aboriginal people are made from the same crooked timber as the rest of us. It is no slander to identify cultural practices they should leave behind.
Perpetuating a romantic view of hunter-gatherer society, which historically was just as bloody and brutish in Australia as on every other continent, does not serve reconciliation, which must eventually mean some kind of integration into modern, mainstream life.
The fabrication of history serves the interests of no one, except those white and black political and academic activists who have lived off its misrepresentations for far too long.
http://www.sydneyline.com/Fabricatio...0year%20on.htm
================================================== ========
Error nullius
To achieve reconciliation we don’t need history books - constant refrains of past wrongs. Reconciliation is not possible between us and the people of 1788 but it may be touched by Australians alive in 2003.
We may never be able to take politics out of history, but we can certainly take historians out of the courtrooms.
In the beginning, they say, was terra nullius - it wasn’t. And reconciliation is too important to be erected on such a shoddy foundation.
Mistakes in universities have effects in the real world.
Academics have shouldered a fashionable burden of guilt, but it’s time to put it down. Misled by one phrase, we imagine we know what happened at settlement when we don’t, and those we should be able to rely on are useless guides.
Reconciliation needs less confrontation and more goodwill: a history written in terms of goodies and baddies cannot be the basis for satisfying political aspirations of the 21st century.
http://bulletin.ninemsn.com.au/bulle...9?OpenDocument
================================================== ===
Enduring myth of 'noble savage' vs. a special at continuous war?
review by Keith Windschuttle of Steven A. LeBlanc, Constant Battles: The Myth of the Peaceful Noble Savage, in Washington Times, August 17 2003 (http://washingtontimes.com/books/200...5047-3673r.htm)
==================================================
"History as a Travesty of the Truth", The Australian, December 9 2002
http://www.sydneyline.com/History%20...of%20Truth.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: Volume One, Van Diemen's Land 1803-1847, Macleay Press
http://www.sydneyline.com/Fabricatio...%20History.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Ten: Aborigines killed by whites, Van Diemen's Land 1803-1834. Revised version
http://www.sydneyline.com/Table%20Ten%20revised.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Eight: Aboriginal killings by colonists recorded by G. A. Robinson, 1829-1839
http://www.sydneyline.com/Table%20Eight%20revised.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Doctored Evidence and Invented Incidents in Aboriginal Historiography", Paper to conference on Frontier Conflict, National Museum of Australia, December 13-14, 2001
http://www.sydneyline.com/National%2...20Conflict.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"When History Falls Victim to Politics", The Age, 14 July, 2001
http://www.sydneyline.com/Evans%20an...pe%20reply.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Black, White and Grey: the Truth about our Past", by Robert Murray, The Age, 13 July 2001
http://www.theage.com.au/news/state/...XNRWZE1PC.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Wrong on Mistake Creek", Australian Financial Review, 18 June 2001
http://www.sydneyline.com/Mistake%20Creek.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Selected Readings", The Australian's Review of Books, April 2001 (reply to Henry Reynolds' article in March 2001)
http://www.sydneyline.com/ARB%20reply%20April%2001.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Exposing academic deception of past wrongs", Sydney Morning Herald, 19 September 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Exposing%2...Deceptions.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"The myths of frontier massacres in Australian history, Part I:
The invention of massacre stories", Quadrant, October 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Massacres%20Part%20One.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The myths of frontier massacres in Australian history, Part II: The fabrication of the Aboriginal death toll", Quadrant, November 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Massacres%20Part%20Two.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The myths of frontier massacres in Australian history, Part III: Massacre stories and the policy of separatism", Quadrant, December 2000
http://www.sydneyline.com/Massacres%20Part%20Three.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washout: On the academic response to the Fabrication of Aboriginal History, by John Dawson. The latest front in the history wars, published December 2004. [launch speech by John Dawson]
http://www.macleaypress.com/Washout.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Killing of History
The Killing of History: How Literary Critics and Social Theorists are Murdering Our Past, revised international edition, Macleay Press, 1996
http://www.macleaypress.com/Killing%20of%20History.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History, truth and postmodernism",
The Great Debate, HSC Extension History, [Keith Windschuttle, Richard Evans and Behan McCullagh vs. Stephen Garton, Joy Damousi and Dirk Moses], University of New South Wales, 27 July 2002
http://www.sydneyline.com/HSC%20History%20talk.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History, Truth and Tribalism",
Lecture for The Historical Society at University of Chicago, November 28, 2001 and Ashbrook Center, Ashland University, Ohio, November 26, 2001 [text] ... [audio version](http://www.sydneyline.com/History%20...0Tribalism.htm)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Real Stuff of History",
The New Criterion, March 1997; reprinted in Hilton Kramer and Roger Kimball (eds.) The Future of the European Past, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago, 1997
http://www.sydneyline.com/Real%20Stu...%20History.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Killing of History", by Roger Kimball, The New Criterion, September 1996
http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/...96/history.htm#
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History must prevail against challenge of cultural studies", The Australian, Higher Education Supplement, November 23 1994
http://www.sydneyline.com/Killing%20HES%201994.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
White Australia and Sixties-generation historians
In the entire period from 1803 when the colonists first arrived in Tasmania, to 1834 when all but one family of Aborigines had been removed to Flinders Island, my calculation is that the British were responsible for killing only 121 of the original inhabitants, mostly in self defence or in hot pursuit of Aborigines who had just assaulted white households. In these incidents, the Aborigines killed 187 colonists.
In all of Europe's colonial encounters with the New Worlds of the Americas and the Pacific, the colony of Van Diemen's Land was probably the site where the least indigenous blood of all was deliberately shed.
Why, then, have the historians of Tasmania told this story about genocide, frontier warfare and widespread bloodshed. I suggest several of the reasons in my book: to make Australian history, which would otherwise be dull and uneventful, seem more dramatic than it really was; to assume the moral high ground and flatter their own vanity as defenders of the Aborigines; in some cases to pursue a traditional Marxist agenda or to indulge in interest group politics of gender, race and class.
In contrast, the proper role of the historian is to try to stand above politics, difficult though this always will be.
Historians should assume a public responsibility to report their evidence fully and accurately, to cite their sources honestly, and to adopt as objective a stand as possible.
To pretend that acceptable interpretations can be drawn from false or non-existent or deceptively selective evidence is to abandon the pursuit of historical truth altogether.
http://www.sydneyline.com/White%20Australia%20and%20Sixties%20generation.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Windschuttle, ABC Classic FM interview by Jana Wendt, December 8 2004
http://www.abc.net.au/classic/throsby
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
White Australia's Myths, The Australian, December 6 2004 [full text] -- [more in Sydney Morning Herald] --[Tim Blair comments]
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/...html?from=top5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Myth of South Sea blackbirding [The Australian on South Sea blackbirding] -- [more on blackbirding myth]
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E2702,00.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Windschuttle, launch speech, The White Australia Policy, December 6 2004
http://www.sydneyline.com/WAP%20launch%20speech.htm
The White Australia Policy is nothing to be proud of, but nor is it anything before which we should cringe or apologise.
Australia is not, and never has been, a fundamentally racist country.
The race card, which the academic left has played for all its moral worth for the last thirty years, is a ring-in that should be dropped from political debate.
But, unfortunately, no one should hold their breath waiting for that to happen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Devine, launch speech, The White Australia Policy and Washout: On the academic respnse to the fabrication of Aboriginal history, December 6 2004
http://www.sydneyline.com/Frank%20De...h%20speech.htm
Keith considers the depiction of racism as the dominant force in Australian history to be a concoction of the past 50 years, by historians sacrificing scholarly discipline to ideology.
Their relentless campaign to make Australians "shudder with vicarious guilt at the colonial past" -- Eric Richard's phrase -- has been politically debilitating.
It has enabled constant denigration as "racist" of reasoned argument against approved positions on multiculturalism, immigration, aboriginal affairs, foreign relations and more.
With his new book, Keith Windschuttle adds momentum to the comment of Emeritus Professor Claudio Veliz, of Boston University, when he launched Fabrication in 2002 :
"It will change the course of Australia's intellectual history."
This is heroic work. May it continue.
==================================
The "goddess" Athena
Athena was a "goddess": with testicles.
Athena was a Caucasian who lived in Crete 5,000 years ago.
"The Parthenon" in Tennessee is a jew racist FRAUD.
Modern Greeks are descendants of the Arabs who left no stone unturned when they raped and pillaged ancient Greeks.
Click Athena to view the Athena Forum, click the jew to see the difference:
What the following story from racist jew Goetz-controlled Microsoft (who also "thinks" Hannibal was a nigger) "forgot" to include in the following article was a PICTURE of the "life size" statue of the "goddess" Athena which was just discovered in a 5,000 year old city in Crete. Had they done so, they would have discovered that this "goddess" has testicles (something jew Goetz clearly doesn't).
http://jacobisrael.us/athena.htm
This "goddess" also has very masculine hands, face, and arms which don't look at all like a "goddess"--suggesting that the jew-controlled media is misrepresenting at LEAST this part of Greek "mythology", just as they're misrepresenting the racial appearance of people from the "middle East". THIS "GODDESS" IS A CAUCASIAN.
=====================
Amazons
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_amazon/
http://www.chicagotribune.com/featur...,2289031.story
Looks like savage Mongol/Turkic nomads owe their horseriding ability and much of their art to Aryans.
This nine-year-old Mongolian girl, Meiramgul, is blond and may share genetic traits with the ancient Sarmations.
To uncover the genetic link between nine-year-old Meiramgul, the blond child of the mountains of western Mongolia, and the long-dead women warriors of the Eurasian steppes, researchers examined snippets of a particular type of genetic information called mitochondrial DNA.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Genetic Memory
http://www.questinstitute.co.uk/dynamic/resources/memory.pdf
http://cognews.com/1058835591/index_html
